Newsgroups
Netiquette
Newsreaders |
Subscribing to Newsgroups |
Posting to Newsgroups |
Netiquette |
Newsgroup Links |
Going Further
The Net is a bustling place which must of necessity be
largely self-policed. Thus, there are certain commonly understood
rules of "Net Etiquette" or "Netiquette" that users of the
Internet and WWW should adhere to. Probably nowhere on the
Net is this more important than in the Newsgroups, where
wildly divergent opinions and different points of view abound.
Netiquette in Newsgroups
On the one hand, a modicum of etiquette is required to
allow newgroups to function efficiently, without sinking
into unrestrained namecalling. On the other hand, there
are issues of sheer volume that dictate frugal posting and
replies. Finally, there are issues of censorship and access
control that are acute in certain of the newgroup hierarchies
(particularly some of the alt. hierarchies) where
young children may be accessing the net. In this section
we address the first two issues and in the final section
we address the issue of access control.
Thou
Shalt Know Thy FAQ
Perhaps the most important rule of using newsgroups is
to "look before you leap". It is advisable to monitor a
newsgroup for a while before you begin to post to it, to
see what kind of material is posted there, to see how tolerant
those that frequent the newsgroup are of divergent opinion,
and to learn where the FAQ is for the newsgroup.
The FAQ stands for the "Frequently Asked Questions."
Most newsgroups post their most frequently asked questions,
along with answers, in an FAQ accessible somewhere on the
Internet (usually at an FTP or HTTP site). For example,
see
these links for lists of newsgroups FAQs.
It is important to locate the FAQ for a newsgroup and
read it before beginning to post questions to the group
for two reasons. First, it is usually a treasure-trove of
information about the subject matter of the newgroup. In
many instances, the most information-filled documents available
on the Internet are FAQs. Secondly, many users of newsgroups
are highly intolerant of users who ask questions or post
information that suggests they have not read the FAQs, and
let them know quickly of their unhappiness in email and
postings to the newgroups.
It is expected that FAQ questions, having already been
answered and placed in an easily accessible archive, will
not be asked again within the newsgroup. Thus, STUDY THE
FAQ BEFORE POSTING QUESTIONS TO THE NEWSGROUP - your question
may have already been answered, many times over; asking
it again will not get you off on the right foot in the newsgroup.
Forsake Posting to Inappropriate
Groups, Lest Thou be Flamed
Another action that can bring swift retribution from members
of a newsgroup is to post information inappropriate to the
newsgroup. For example, if you post an ad for your old Macintosh
SE in the newsgroup comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html
(which is devoted to authoring html documents and frequented
by some rather nice people and also by some highly intolerant
and opinionated people), you should just lay low for a few
days because you will be bashed mightily--and rightfully
so in this case--by email and postings from irate members
of the newsgroup. Such email attacks are called "Flaming,"
and are a common punishment for those who violate newsgroup
etiquette.
Thou Verily, Verily
Had Better not Spam the Net
Particularly reprehensible to denizens of newsgroups is
the practice of blanket-posting something to every newsgroup
around, whether appropriate or not. For example, the posting
to all Usenet newsgroups of an advertisement promoting a
commercial product or service falls into this category.
Such postings are called "Spamming," and those judged
guilty of spamming the net may be flamed so badly that their
computer systems become unusable for a period because of
the volume of email sent in protest.
Often, material being posted is appropriate for several
newsgroups, and it is quite acceptable to post to multiple
groups in that case. However, DO NOT POST TO GROUPS THAT
ARE NOT INTERESTED; post only to those groups clearly related
to the subject matter of your message.
Censorship and Access
Issues of censorship and access control are of direct
relevance to K-12 education because amidst the material
available on the Internet that is of enormous educational
potential, there is also material (often in certain Newsgroups)
that even the hardiest civil libertarian would probably
agree is not appropriate for small children - for example,
graphical depiction of child pornography, vicious racism
from bigots of various stripes, and detailed instructions
on how to build bombs from some extremely paranoid people
are all there. In some cases this material can raise questions
that go beyond those of appropriateness and taste: its distribution
and ownership may also be deemed illegal, particularly within
certain jurisdictions. For example, possession of child
pornography is likely to be illegal as well as reprehensible.
In most cases this material is also readily available
from non-Internet sources (your local Adult Bookstore, for
example), but its availability on the Net is a particularly
sensitive issue because it is harder to monitor the age
of persons accessing material on the Net than to check the
age of patrons at the adult bookstore (and because people
tend to be more comfortable with the devil they know than
with a newfangled one in technical garb).
Classroom Liability
Teachers using the Internet in class should be aware of
these potential problems. It is advisable to obtain consent
forms from parents emphasizing that while all efforts will
be directed toward seeing that children access appropriate
material, common sense dictates that no monitoring system
is foolproof, and in the final analysis students must also
assume responsibility for accessing only appropriate material.
Possible Software Solutions
There are partial software solutions to help with some
of these problems in the K-12 environment. These software
approaches to the problem tend to fall into two general
classes:
- Solutions that block net
access to certain addresses deemed to contain objectionable
material.
- Solutions that block access
based on the appearance of certain words or phrases in
the data being downloaded.
We can see immediately that neither of these approaches
is foolproof: one can never know all addresses that might
contain objectionable material, and monitoring based on
the occurrence of certain words or phrases might easily
screen out daily newspapers or even the Bible.
Examples and discussions of these issues, and child safety
in general on the Internet, may be found in the section
on Internet Safety.
|